Title: Seismic Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls with Vertical Joint Connectors
Date: January-February, 2004
Volume: 49
Issue: 1
Page number: 58-79
Author(s): Felipe J. Perez, Stephen Pessiki, Richard Sause
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012004.58.79

Click here to access the full journal article

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation of the seismic design of precast concrete wall panels connected along vertical joints with ductile connectors and to the foundation along horizontal joints using unbonded post-tensioning steel. Closed-form expressions are derived to estimate key values defining a trilinear idealized lateral load behavior of the walls. A proposed seismic design approach is developed using base shear demands recommended by current building codes. Unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls with substantial initial lateral stiffness can be designed to resist seismic  forces – without yielding of the post-tensioning steel – by absorbing and dissipating energy in the vertical joint connections. In a companion paper (“Lateral Load Behavior of  Unbonded Post-Tensioned  Precast Concrete Walls with Vertical Joints” scheduled for publication in the next issue of the PCI JOURNAL),1 the authors describe a fiber-based analytical model used in a design parameter study of several unbonded posttensioned precast concrete walls with vertical joints. The companion paper presents the results of  the analytical parameter study and uses those results to verify the accuracy of the closed-form expressions derived in this paper.

References

1. Perez, F. J., Pessiki, S., and Sause, R., “Lateral Load Behavior of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls with Vertical Joints,” scheduled for publication in the March-April 2004 PCI  JOURNAL.

2. Fintel, M., “Performance of Buildings with Shear Walls in  Earthquakes of the Last Thirty Years,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 40, No. 3, May-June 1995, pp. 62-80.

3. Kurama, Y., Sause, R., Pessiki, S., and Lu, L.-W., “Lateral  Load Behavior and Seismic Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V.  96, No. 4, July-August 1999, pp. 622-632.

4. Shultz, A. E., and Magaña, R. A., “Seismic Behavior of Connections in Precast Concrete Walls,” Mete A. Sozen Symposium, SP-162, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1996.

5. Nakaki, S. D., Stanton, J. F., and Sritharan, S., “An Overview of the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Test Building,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 44, No. 2, March-April 1999, pp. 26-39.

6. Priestley, M. J. N., Sritharan, S., Conley, J. R., and Pampanin, S., “Preliminary Results and Conclusions From the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Concrete Test Building,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 44, No. 6,  November-December 1999, pp. 42-67.

7. Stanton, J. F., and Nakaki, S. D., “Design Guidelines for Precast Concrete Seismic Structural Systems,” PREcast Seismic Structural Systems (PRESSS) Report No. 01/03-09, University of Washington  UW) Report No. SM 02-02, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, February 2002.

8. Perez, F. J., “Lateral Load Behavior and Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls with Ductile Vertical Joint Connectors,” M.S. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, December 1998, 201 pp.

9. Perez, F. J., Pessiki, S., and Sause, R., “Lateral Load Behavior and Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls with Ductile Vertical Joint Connectors,” Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems (ATLSS) Report No. 99-01, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, January 1999, 127 pp.

10. Priestley, M. J. N., and Tao, J. R., “Seismic Response of Precast Prestressed Concrete Frames with Partially Debonded Tendons,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 38, No. 1, January-February 1993, pp. 58-69.

11. Mander, J., Priestley, M., and Park, R., “Theoretical Stress- Strain Model for Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 114, No. 8, August 1988, pp. 1804-1826.

12. Mander, J., Priestley, M., and Park, R., “Observed Stress-Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 114, No. 8, August 1988, pp. 1827-1849.

13. Perez, F. J., Pessiki, S., Sause, R., and Lu, L.-W., “Lateral Load Tests of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls,” SP-211-8, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2003, pp.  161-182.

14. BSSC, “NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings,” Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC, 1997.

15. ICBO, Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, 1997. 

16. ICC, “International Building Code 2000,” International Code Council, Falls Church, VA,  2001.

17. BSSC, “NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings,” FEMA-273, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC, 1997.

18. Kurama, Y., Pessiki, S., Sause, R., and Lu, L.-W., “Seismic Behavior and Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast  Concrete Walls,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 44, No. 3, May-June 1999, pp. 72-89.

19. Freeman, S., “Racking Tests of High-Rise Building Partitions,” Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 103, No. ST8, August 1977, pp. 1673-1685.

20. Kurama, Y., Sause, R., Pessiki, S., and Lu, L.-W., “Seismic Response Evaluation of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 5, September-October 2002, pp.  641-651.

21. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-99),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1999.

22. Prakash, V., and Powell, G., “DRAIN-2DX Base Program Description and User Guide; Version 1.10,” Report No. UCB/SEMM-93/17, Structural Engineering Mechanics and  Materials, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California,  Berkeley, CA, November 1993.

23. Miranda, E., “Inelastic Displacement Ratios for Structures on Firm Sites,” Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 126, No. 10, October 2000, pp. 1150-1159.

24. Ruiz-Garcia, J., and Miranda, E., “Inelastic Displacement Ratios for Evaluation of Existing Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, V. 32, No. 8, July 2003, pp. 1237-1258.

25. Miranda, E., and Ruiz-Garcia, E., “Evaluation of Approximate Methods to Estimate Maximum Inelastic Displacement Demands,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, V.  31, No. 3, March 2002, pp. 539-560.